Filho da Mãe/Son of a Mother

Movie Name: Filho da Mãe/Son of a Mother
Year of Release: 2022
Director: Jú Amaral, Susana Garcia
Starring: Paulo Gustavo, Déa Lúcia, Ingrid Guimarães, Thales Bretas, Regina Casé, Marcus Majella, Mônica Martelli, Malu Valle, Pedro Bial, Preta Gil, Fil Braz, IZA, Júlio Márcio Monteiro de Barros, Carol Del Vecchio
Genre: Documentary
Score out of ten (whole numbers only): 7
Watch it on Amazon Prime

Synopsis and Review

For those of you who don't know who Paulo Gustavo is, this documentary is a great introduction to this force of nature, who sadly passed away in 2021. Paulo Gustavo was a genial writer/producer/actor/performer, who rose to great heights of popularity in Brazil, thanks to his play, which was later converted into a film (with two sequels), "A Minha Mãe é uma Peça". This documentary, co-authored by Susana Garcia (who collaborated with Paulo Gustavo in the second sequel to the blockbuster "A Minha Mãe é uma Peça"), and Paulo's sister Jú Amaral, tracks Paulo Gustavo's last years of existence, as he goes through a sold out tour with his mother named "Filho da Mãe". The documentary which starts by capturing the dynamics of Paulo and his mother, and how their tour and show across Brazil was going, quickly evolves to being an homage, a retrospective on who this talented performer actually was. Many of his collaborators, family, and friends provide insights into the person he was, his path in theater, and later on film, though the documentary fails to provide enough context into all the creative endeavors he was able to touch upon, and particularly how insightful and funny he was with all the characters he created for the various shows he was a part of. This documentary ultimately sheds light on how generous, intelligent, talented, and unapologetic Paulo Gustavo was, and the impact he had on the lives of his loved ones, his fans, and also Brazil and those who were (and are) familiar with his work (and even on how an openly gay performer, was able to get married, have children with his partner, and face prejudice, all the while staying truthful to himself). It also illustrates the grave consequences of the pandemic, how much Brazil was impacted by it, particularly seen through the eyes of someone who was desperate to get vaccinated, and whose life was cut short as a result of a vaccine arriving too late. It's a great introduction to the personality and enormous talent of a wonderful individual. 

The Long Walk

Movie Name: The Long Walk
Year of Release: 2025
Director: Francis Lawrence
Starring: Cooper Hoffman, David Jonsson, Judy Greer, Mark Hamill, Garrett Wareing, Tut Nyuot, Charlie Plummer, Ben Wang, Jordan Gonzalez, Joshua Odjick, Roman Griffin Davis, Josh Hamilton, Noah de Mel, Daymon Wrightly 
Score out of ten (whole numbers only): 6
Watch it on Amazon

Synopsis and Review

Director Francis Lawrence has coined the world of young adult film adaptations since he started directing the adaptation of the various books which comprise the "Hunger Games" series. To date he has directed 4 films of that series, with the 5th, "Sunrise of the Reaping" premiering in the last quarter of 2026. "The Long Walk", even though isn't part of that universe, has some interesting ties to it, namely the dystopian reality in which the characters live, and also the fact that young adults are targeted in the events taking place. The film is an adaptation of the 1979 book by Stephen King, and follows the story of Raymond Garraty, a young man (18) who has volunteered to be a part of the Long Walk, not only to win the monetary prize, but also to get his chance at the "Wish fulfillment" that comes with it. In this version of North America, there's a totalitarian regime in power, and this is an annual competition where boys have to continuously walk along Route 1 and maintain a pace of 4 miles per hour. If they fail to do so, they get three warnings, and if they continue to fail, they're shot and killed by soldiers who are monitoring the event. Raymond has his own agenda about enrolling in the Walk, even if it means shattering the life of his mom. His dad was brutally murdered in front of them both, just for sharing forbidden books and teaching him the meaning of critical thinking. Raymond quickly becomes friends with Peter McVries, whom we come to find out, had a very challenging upbringing, and who views this Walk and its prize, as a means to secure a freedom that he has never experienced before. As the group starts the walk, with young men from all areas of the country, some of them start experiencing physical issues related to exhaustion, or physical constraints, but the military is brutal in their reaction, killing them instantly, something that only strengthens the conviction of Raymond and Peter, who want to finish the walk. 

For a book written in 1979, and considering the reality of the US in 2026, one can fairly say Stephen King was spot on when he wrote this narrative. Francis Lawrence opts for a fairly visually stripped down view on the events that he's capturing: most of the places these young men walk through, look and feel very downbeat, depressing, lackluster, and devoid of hope. The walk itself is meant to symbolize the survival of the strongest, but it mostly illustrates how despots eliminate opposition, or even a semblance of critical thinking. These young men all have a very unique agenda to enroll in this competition, and as their motivations become clearer, the sadder the situation becomes, because one soon realizes most of them are going to be brutally murdered, just so the regime can continue to bully, demoralize, and destroy anyone or anything that questions their decision making process. It's a film that makes a lot of sense for the current state of affairs across various countries in the world, though where the film falters a bit, is in its ability to provide these characters with a bit more of an arc, of a background. The brief moments where they become truly alive, right before they get murdered, is just not enough. Interesting detail: Mr. Lawrence, who is a stylistic and visually gifted film-maker, opts for a muted palette for the film, which illustrates the decrepitude of the country, with the clothes of the young men, and of the people they cross paths with, at times representing the glimmer of hope it still exists, that this reality can be turned around. The cast is uniformly solid, particularly Cooper Hoffman, David Jonsson, Judy Greer, and Charlie Plummer. The production team is equally solid, though I personally found the cinematography from Jo Willems, a bit underwhelming, particularly during the day-time scenes. Heather Neale's costumes were spot on, as was Nicolas Lepage production design. It's a film that is very relevant for our days, and a warning call for how quickly dehumanizing individuals and brutality can become a standard if we don't pay attention and fight back tyranny. Worth watching.

Doppelganger

Movie Name: Doppelganger
Year of Release: 1993
Director: Avi Nesher
Starring: Drew Barrymore, George Newbern, Dennis Christopher, Leslie Hope, Sally Kellerman, George Maharis, Peter Dobson, Carl Bressler, Dan Shor, Jaid Barrymore, Stanley DeSantis, Danny Trejo
Score out of ten (whole numbers only): 0
Watch it on Tubi

Synopsis and Review

By the time "Doppelganger" came out, writer/director Avi Nesher had already been steadily working on feature films for over a decade. During the 1980s he wrote and directed "She" featuring Sandahl Bergman, which piggybacked on the sword and sorcery genre that John Milius boosted when he wrote and directed "Conan, The Barbarian" in 1982. The film follows the story of Holly Gooding, whom we firstly encounter arriving in LA, looking for a place to live. She ends up sharing a place with Patrick, a writer who posted a room for rent, even if his space only has one bedroom. Holly and Patrick become friends, even though Patrick believes there's some quirkiness to her personality. He confides this impression to his writing partner and former girlfriend, Elizabeth. In the interim he finds out that Holly has a brother who is interned at a psychiatric hospital, after killing their father. He also uncovers that Holly is a suspect in the killing of her mom in New York. Holly admits she has a doppelganger, and that she is the one responsible for all that goes badly in her life, including the killing of her mom. She informs Patrick that her therapist Dr. Heller, can confirm the veracity of her statements. Patrick in the interim, is attacked by someone identical to Holly's supposedly dead father, and finally has a confrontation with Dr. Heller where a lot of the events taking place become clear.

This film is perplexing. And possibly quite nuts, but either way, it's a film that Ed Wood would be quite pleased to showcase or possibly feature side by side with one of his creative outputs. "Doppelganger" came out just as Drew Barrymore's career was starting to take off, since Jonathan Kaplan's "Bad Girls" came out in 1994, and started opening other professional doors for her. It's quite puzzling that writer/director Avi Nesher managed to get Drew Barrymore, George Newbern (who had already done the successful "Father of the Bride" from director Charles Shyer), and Leslie Hope (who had already done Oliver Stone's "Talk Radio" and Emilio Estevez's "Men At Work"), for a script that is nonsensical, with no character development, featuring a third act that is truly insane. This film attempts to illustrate a pre "Melrose Place" vibe of what it's like to be a young creative trying to make it in LA, mixing it with a noir narrative of sorts, throwing in a monster episode into the kitchen sink just for good measure in the third chapter, all of this without a semblance of coherence, taste, humor, or for that matter, logic. This is the type of film that will literally make the audience ask themselves, "What am I watching here". It's dumbfounding, with rotten performances from everyone involved, and at some point with Dennis Christopher's over the top performance taking place, one can't help but ask - "Is this deliberately so bad that it's like an art installation on how a bad film should be made?". The film amazingly features a score from the talented Jan A.P. Kaczmarek (who won an Oscar for the score of Marc Forster's "Finding Neverland"), but the overall production team is rather forgettable. This film is not forgettable, but that is solely because of how atrocious it manages to be. 

The Cave

Movie Name: The Cave
Year of Release: 2005
Director: Bruce Hunt
Starring: Cole Hauser, Eddie Cibrian, Lena Headey, Piper Perabo, Morris Chestnut, Daniel Dae Kim, Rick Ravanello, Kieran Darcy-Smith, Marcel Iures, Simon Kunz, Vlad Radescu, David Kennedy
Score out of ten (whole numbers only): 2
Watch it on Amazon

Synopsis and Review

"The Cave" is Bruce Hunt's feature directorial debut. He previously worked as a second and third unit director for The Wachowskis during the making of "The Matrix" trilogy (not the 4th installment). The narrative focuses on the story of brothers Jack and Tyler McAllister, who alongside a select few, comprise a team specialized in getting to underwater locations that are unreachable by most. They're hired to come assist Dr. Nikolai, his associate, Dr. Kathryn Jennings, and cameraman Alex Kim, in assessing an unexplored cave located underneath the grounds of a former abbey, in the Carpathian Mountains. As the team begins the descent, they suffer an unexpected attack from a creature they can't identify, but that eventually results in all of them being trapped in the cave, as a result of a rock fall. Jack is also attacked by one of those creatures, but manages to escape. Kathryn analyzes the blood of the creature, and hypothesizes that they're possibly creatures that originated above ground, but have since adapted to their environment underground. As they continue to move towards an exit, they uncover the remains of prior explorations. They also continue to get attacked and plucked, while Jack starts mutating as a result of being attacked. 

A group of individuals goes to a cave and comes across a mutated species who attacks and kills them. If that succinct premise sounds familiar, that's because it is the essence of the excellent Neil Marshall written and directed film, "The Descent". This version of "trapped by the confinements of nature and at the mercy of mutated creatures" is authored by Michael Steinberg (who wrote and directed the well received "The Waterdance" and "Bodies, Rest & Motion" during the 1990s) and Tegan West (this was the first writing credit for this professional primarily known for his acting resume). What could have easily been an underwater/cave version of "Alien" or "Aliens", turns out to be nothing of the sort, since the creative team and the poorly developed script, don't provide much information, depth, or motivation for these characters, aside from some friction moments, and other moments where they become the target for barely there and seen monstrous creatures (the aspect of not revealing the creatures isn't necessarily a bad thing). Mr. Hunt could have easily leveraged the darkness of the cave, and the uniqueness of the claustrophobic confinements of it, to create a taut exercise in suspense, fear, and ultimately demise. Sadly, the film comes across as a get together of a series of wannabe A-list actors, all of whom realize this film isn't going to be much, and eventually turn on the auto-pilot during much of its duration. None of these characters ever exhibit or share much about themselves, something that would render them more credible, and eventually make them more than fodder for some monstrous creature. And that includes the characters who are supposedly siblings. It's a film that lacks humor, that takes itself far too seriously, and that is unable to create a sense of camaraderie, or even complicity between a group of people simply trying to survive. The cast isn't particularly inspired, including the always reliable Lena Headey, who has very little to do here. The production team is solid, including Reinhold Heil and Johnny Klimek's score, Ross Emery's cinematography, and Pier Luigi Basile's production design. It's ultimately a lackluster and generic monster film that wastes an interesting premise with a clumsy narrative development and stunted character dimension. 

Bang My Box: The Robin Byrd Story, Marty Life is Short

Movie Name: Bang My Box: The Robin Byrd Story
Year of Release: 2026
Director: Jyllian Gunther, Stephanie Schwam
Starring: Robin Byrd, Shelby Byrd, Daylon Orr, Sandra Bernhard, Lou Cass, Porsche Lynn, Sean McKenna, Michael Musto, Cheri Oteri, Bob Morris
Genre: Documentary
Score out of ten (whole numbers only): 8
Watch it on HBO Max

Synopsis and Review

Prior to watching this documentary, I have to admit I had never heard of Robin Byrd. However, Jyllian Gunther and Stephanie Schwam have both managed to illustrate not only Ms. Byrd's incredibly colorful life, but also the impact that her shows, have had on society. While some may be quick to dismiss this documentary as something solely focused on sex work or the evolution of pornography on TV, Video, and Digital, this documentary humanizes and gives context to the life of Ms. Byrd, the challenges she had, and most of all, the incredible resilience, intelligence, and resourcefulness she has had during her life. It's also an incredibly touching document of New York during the AIDS epidemic, how marginalized individuals were being brushed to the sides, and how her show managed to bring sex education, playfulness, and irreverence to cable TV. It's a documentary that takes the audience on the journey of finding out more about Robin Byrd, her devoted husband Shelby, but also how the stigma of sex work, sex positivity, and even gay visibility on mainstream media has evolved since the 1970s. Worth watching. 

Movie Name: Marty, Life is Short
Year of Release: 2026
Director: Lawrence Kasdan
Starring: Martin Short, Eugene Levy, Catherine O'Hara, Steve Martin, Tom Hanks, Steven Spielberg, Andrea Martin, Michael Short, Oliver Short, Rita Wilson, Walter F. Parkes, Laurie MacDonald, Kate Capshaw, Paul Shaffer, Nora Short, Brian Short, Nancy Dolman, David Short, Ron Howard
Genre: Documentary
Score out of ten (whole numbers only): 7
Watch it on Netflix

Synopsis and Review

The wonderfully talented Lawrence Kasdan (director of "Body Heat", "The Big Chill", "Grand Canyon", and "The Accidental Tourist", to name but a few), has directed a wonderful homage on the consistently underrated Martin Short. This documentary traces his roots back to his home country Canada, how he started his acting career, all through Mr. Short recalling his own memories, archival footage, and just as importantly, through the depositions of his close friends and co-workers, including Eugene Levy, Catherine O'Hara, Andrea Martin, all talented individuals who came from a similar background and stayed friends with him for over 50 years. It's a documentary that illustrates how much of a family centered person Mr. Short is, his ability to create ties with friends who have stayed with him for decades, including his partnership with Steve Martin, but also the emotional bonds he has created with Tom Hanks, Steven Spielberg, their families, and other known artists in the Hollywood milieu. It's a film that focuses mostly on the emotional ties Mr. Short has created, particularly the one towards his late wife, but also the ones he has shaped and cherished with his children and friends. The documentary does illustrate Mr. Short's colorful career, but doesn't necessarily probe deeper on what has made him gravitate towards certain material, or certain characters. It's a documentary that humanizes this iconic performer, but also one that leaves the cinephile fan a bit undernourished, when it comes to understanding the long career path of this talented performer. It's a moving homage, and one worth watching. 

The Devil Wears Prada 2

Movie Name: The Devil Wears Prada 2
Year of Release: 2026
Director: David Frankel
Starring: Meryl Streep, Anne Hathaway, Emily Blunt, Stanley Tucci, Kenneth Branagh, Lucy Liu, Justin Theroux, Tracie Thoms, Tibor Feldman, B.J. Novak, Patrick Brammall, Simone Ashley, Caleb Hearon, Helen J Shen, Rachel Bloom, Larry Mitchell, George C. Wolfe
Score out of ten (whole numbers only): 2
Watch it on Amazon

Synopsis and Review

The original "The Devil Wears Prada" came out in 2006, and while not a particularly good film, it has since then grown in popularity, particularly Meryl Streep's iconic performance as Miranda Priestly, which was always the main reason the film had some relevance and has since then become something many other films and tv shows, have attempted to mimic (with the boss from hell type of premise). This sequel picks up 20 years after the original. Andrea Sachs is now a celebrated journalist, but sadly gets laid off from the newspaper she works for, alongside a group of colleagues and friends as she's collecting an award. In the interim Runway has also evolved, now primarily focused on digital, though still under the tutelage and guidance of Miranda Priestly. One of Runway's articles gets Miranda in trouble on social media, and Irv Ravitz the business mogul owner of Elias-Clarke (and Runway), hires Andy as a features editor, without consulting Miranda. Andy's return is not taken very seriously, though Nigel understands what she's attempting to do, though her articles and efforts get no traction. Emily in the interim has become a top player at Dior, one of Runway's top advertising clients. At the risk of losing her position, Andy eventually manages to get an interview with the elusive Sasha Barnes, the ex-wife of billionaire tech mogul Benji Barnes. This article turns the tide for Runway and Andy, also positioning Miranda to get the next role she wants to play in Irv's conglomerate, that of Head of Global Content. Sadly, during his birthday celebration, he passes away, changing everyone's life in the process. 

If there has ever been a film that is literally about nothing, this is one good case for it. What made Miranda Priestly so interesting in the first film has now been reduced to a caricature, and that includes even her relationship with her husband Stuart, which is illustrated as superficially as possible. The creative team behind this film constructed this narrative based on feedback from users on IMDB and/or Reddit boards, and essentially distilled it all into the following aspects: more fashion, more opulence, more runways with cameos from fashion designers of various labels, while capturing all these events with various other cameos from stylists, pop culture personalities, and whatever else can be deemed as "relevant". Somewhere along the line, whatever purpose this film was meant to have, completely disappeared, and became a superficial bauble about nothing. These characters have no depth, their relationships are inconsequential, and there's not much sense for what they've become since we last saw them from the first film. There's an attempt at picking fun at guileless billionaires, by getting Justin Theroux to play an over the top and smitten tech mogul who literally has nothing much to do, while also capturing the reasonable and deeply intelligent ex-wife of that mogul, played by Lucy Liu, and once again making these characters as basic and meaningless as possible. The script doesn't have the snark or intelligence to position the parody of some of these characters as vicious as it should be, nor does it have the ambition and subtlety to give dimension to the ones who are supposed to represent the more humane and admirable path very rich people should take. The creative team, including writer Aline Brosh McKenna, looked at what Darren Star and Michael Patrick King did with the series "And Just Like That", and basically said: we can do that, and even overdo it. And indeed they have. While this film has been successful on the shoulders of a rather mediocre first film, it has also done a disservice to everyone else involved. Meryl Streep as always manages to walk away from this film with her dignity intact, the same going for Stanley Tucci (I personally don't understand why the fantastic Kenneth Branagh was in this). The rest of the cast should definitely rethink their choice of roles and projects. The production team is competent, featuring Florian Ballhaus cinematography, Theodore Shapiro's score, and Molly Rogers' costume design. It's a forgettable film with some good actors, and that's it. 

Red Sonja

Movie Name: Red Sonja
Year of Release: 2025
Director: MJ Bassett
Starring: Matilda Lutz, Robert Sheehan, Wallis Day, Trevor Eve, Luca Pasqualino, Rhona Mitra, Michael Bisping, Martyn Ford, Tony Way, Katrina Durden, Ben Radcliffe, Tim McMullan, Eliza Matengu, Danica Davis
Score out of ten (whole numbers only): 1
Watch it on Amazon

Synopsis and Review

The world of comic book adaptations doesn't end with Marvel and DC comics and the studios backing them. There's plenty of iconic characters that live outside that ecosystem. "Red Sonja" has had a steady cult following for years since it appeared in Marvel adventures in 1973 (inspired by Robert E. Howard's writings, which hail back to 1934 - 1935 when he started writing "Conan the Barbarian" and created that whole universe of sword and sorcery). This version of "Red Sonja" follows the adventures of the valiant warrior since a small child, when her village is invaded by barbarians, who kill her mother in the process, and push her to live in the woods. Sonja grows up by herself, having nothing but a horse as a companion, respecting nature and the woods that provide nourishment and protection for her. New in her adulthood, Sonja realizes the forest is being pillaged by mercenaries hunting for animals for gladiator games that honor the emperor Draygan. Retaliating against the cruelty of these mercenaries, Sonja is eventually captured and taken back to also fight in the games. Sonja gradually gains the camaraderie of others, who like her, were also captured and have to fight for their survival in the games. When she frees a mythological Cyclops creature, she and her group of friends flee, in order to prepare for the juggernaut of violence the emperor will unleash upon them. 

Unlike the "Red Sonja" from Richard Fleischer which premiered in 1985, and had many of the traces the director had established with "Conan the Destroyer" in 1984, this new iteration of this heroine lacks both a strong directorial point of view, alongside a script that does this character and her adventures some justice. The narrative fails to make Sonja the rebel and the indomitable spirit she was in the comics, not to mention when the magical and supernatural aspects of the story occur, they do so without much context to it (spoiler warning: she gets dropped in this magical pond, that cures everything, including her mortal wounds, and gives her hair a much needed injection of color). The film feels like a cobbled web of episodes, and less of a structured script where the central character creates bonds with others, where we witness what makes other characters special or unique. The writers gathered/pillaged inspiration from "The Lord of the Rings", "Gladiator", and even some sprinkles from Guillermo del Toro's universe, and tried to create some coherence into this narrative, sadly there's so many jarring aspects to it, incluing the existence of an Emperor who looks like a New York talent scout, where the villainess Annisia has no discernible personality, but listens to demonic voices, which is apparently an apt replacement for a personality, and looks like a model ready for her "Project Runway" catwalk. There are different species also co-existing with humans, but that's not mentioned either, so this film ends up being a porridge with many different ingredients, all of which don't necessarily taste well together. MJ Bassett who has primarily made a career for herself directing TV episodes for shows including "The Equalizer" and "Reacher", illustrates rather generically what is on this script, once again trying to emulate what others have done better and with more resources. While this film is clearly a low budget endeavor, at times much can be done with modest resources, something "Obsession" has aptly proven many times over: MJ Bassett however fails to bring a unique point of view to the sequences, the action driven ones, and the more low volume ones. It would have been so interesting to see what Bryan Fuller or someone unexpected like Coralie Fargeat could have done with this material. The cast doesn't fare very well, sadly more so for Matilda Lutz who was so unforgettable in "Revenge", and here is completely wasted. Robert Sheehan, who has made a name for himself with "The Umbrella Academy", is in a different film altogether, while Trevor Eve and Rhona Mitra are just trying to keep their dignity (and bank accounts) with some padding. Simply put: this isn't good at all. 

Masters of the Universe

Movie Name: Masters of the Universe
Year of Release: 2026
Director: Travis Knight
Starring: Nicholas Galitzine, Camila Mendes, Idris Elba, Jared Leto, Alison Brie, Jon Xue Zhang, Jóhannes Haukur Jóhannesson, Charlotte Riley, James Purefoy, Sam C. Wilson, Kristen Wiig, Morena Baccarin, Christiaan Bettridge Artie Wilkinson-Hunt, Eire Farrell, James Wilkinson, Dolph Lundgren
Score out of ten (whole numbers only): 4
Watch it on Amazon

Synopsis and Review

Cracking the code of a good adaptation for the 1980s animated series "He-Man and the Masters of the Universe", seems to be an impossible task. The prior version from Gary Goddard, in his sole directorial endeavor, was met with negative reviews, even if it had an eclectic cast which included Dolph Lundgren, Frank Langella, Courteney Cox, and Meg Foster. This new version from director Travis Knight, who previously directed the fantastic "Kubo and the Two Strings" and the well received "Bumblebee", doesn't fare much better, mostly because the film has a challenging script and tone that can't quite find its footing. The narrative follows the story of Adam, who is the son of the King and Queen of Eternia. He is trained by Duncan, the king's Man-At-Arms, who is also the father of his friend Teela, however Adam is smaller than everyone else, and has some challenges. His life, and that of everyone in Eternia, is forever changed when the planet is invaded by Skeletor. He captures the King and Queen while Adam is sequestered by the Sorceress, guardian of Castle Grayskull. He is sent through a multi-dimensional portal to Earth, however during his escape, Adam loses the sword. 15 years later, Adam is working in human resources and shares an apartment with his friend Hussein. He obsesses about finding his sword, and doesn't have much of a private life. He finally gets a text that his sword has been found, and causes all sorts of ruckus at a local comic book store where it's located. As it turns out, the sword is indeed the legitimate one, and it has acted like a beacon to indicate its location. Adam is attacked by one of Skeletor's minions, only to be saved by Teela. They manage to escape, and head back to Eternia, a place that is now very different than what Adam has remembered. They have Skeletor to defeat, and bring back Eternia to its lost wonder.

While "He-Man" does come across as a super hero (of sorts), this film has a bit of a challenge in creating an origin story that does it justice. On one hand the script forcibly tries to be funny (Adam works in HR, where conflict and friction are addressed by joint conversations and collaboration), and secondly it doesn't provide much depth about who Adam actually is, aside from the anecdotal aspect he has a roommate (who apparently doesn't work and spends all his time looking at the TV). There isn't much context as to what has happened to Adam during the 15 years he was on Earth and how he even adapted to such a different reality. The fish out of water narrative does indeed present itself, but in how Adam readjusts himself to Eternia and to the fact that no one remembers him, or think of him as a lame and feeble individual. As it happens, no one in Eternia knows the meaning of pacifism, or truces, or finding a compromise when a war needs to come to an end. The script for this film is quite puzzling, since on one hand the creative team introduces Duncan, the Man-At-Arms as an alcoholic with something to prove to himself and his daughter, while on the other, it makes Skeletor as a bit of clownish villain, with no backdrop, or perspective other than wanting to rule the planet of Eternia. The film has all these influences from various films, including the iconic "Star Wars" saga, but while trying to entertain children, it fails to realize that these characters can't just be human versions of the cartoon, they have to behave and feel like real people. The creative team for this film should have looked at what Jonathan Goldstein and John Francis Daley did with "Dungeons and Dragons: Honor Among Thieves", and created a script that is able to appeal to a child, but still retain enough character dimension and quirkiness, that goes beyond colorful costumes and questionable line reads regarding some of the characters' names. The cast sadly can't do much with the material, though Idris Elba is always great, the same going for Alison Brie. The production team is competent and solid, including Fabian Wagner's cinematography, Daniel Pemberton's score, and Guy Hendrix Dyas' production design. It's a missed opportunity for a director who has demonstrated a strong affinity for material that crosses multiple generations of viewers. 

Obsession

Movie Name: Obsession
Year of Release: 2025
Director: Curry Barker
Starring: Inde Navarrette, Michael Johnston, Cooper Tomlinson, Megan Lawless, Andy Richter, Haley Fitzgerald, Darin Toonder, Anthony Pavone, Anthony Casabianca, Chloe Breen
Score out of ten (whole numbers only): 7
Watch it on Amazon

Synopsis and Review

"Obsession", not referring to the Brian De Palma film with the same name released in 1976, has become a cultural phenomenon, particularly the aspect of the narrative of how such a low budget film has managed to outsmart, and outperform the bigger budget films that have premiered alongside it. The film follows the story of Baron Bailey, affectionately named Bear by his friends, who works at a local record store alongside Nikki, Ian, and Sarah. Bear has romantic feelings towards Nikki, but doesn't know how to approach her. He fears she has placed him in a "friend zone", and doesn't even consider him dating material. On one occasion he goes to a crystal shop to buy Nikki a replacement tiger's eye necklace, but ends up buying a "One Wish Willow", a novelty item that claims to grant one wish per person, once broken. Following an interaction with Nikki, where he once again chickens out, he decides to use the wish on himself, and wishes that Nikki loved him more than anything or anyone else. She immediately appears near him, and asks to stay with him over night. They eventually start kissing, but during it, she stops the contact, moves away and screams horrified, as if she has no idea of what is happening. She gets back to normal, but the following morning Bear witnesses a shrine she built honoring his dead cat. She explains her mood swings are from taking MDMA. They start dating and Nikki is at his place all the time. Sarah in the meantime mentions to Bear that Nikki saw him as a "little brother", and this sudden change of heart may hide something more sinister. That night Bear wakes up and is freaked out when he notices Nikki is wide awake and is watching him sleep. The next morning when he goes to work he's surprised that she duct-taped the front door, and from then on the events just start getting more disturbing. 

"Obsession" is Curry Barker's sophomore directorial endeavor, and it has already opened a variety of doors for him. Unlike Robert Rodriguez's "El Mariachi", which was a low budget film, and it looked as such, "Obsession" while also low budget, doesn't look like it, and it has an assuredness, polish, and point of view which are hard to dismiss. One can easily try to compare this film with what Osgood Perkins has been doing with his brand of low budget, retro-looking, horror films for Neon (particularly "Longlegs" and "The Monkey"), but Mr. Barker goes in a very different direction. "Obsession" smartly has a progressive disclosure type of narrative, where the characters slowly reveal themselves, and more details about the characters keep emerging as the narrative unfolds. There's some stylistic choices made that are reminiscent of David Cronenberg from the 1980s, but the film retains a freshness and unexpectedness to it, that also brings to mind David Robert Mitchell and his most resounding feature, "It Follows". One of the most successful aspects to this film is the ability the writer/director has to build this universe, trace these characters' lives, and sharply introduce disruption, graphically illustrating extreme behaviors that are unexpected and shocking. This film could have easily been a harrowing look at misogyny and objectification, but instead becomes something else, far more disturbing and quite unforgettable. Much of the success of this film lies with its actors, particularly Inde Navarrette, who is superb in what is almost a dual role. On one hand, she plays the cool and friendly Nikki, and once the supernatural tone kicks in, she becomes something else, a force that stops at nothing and at no-one. Michael Johnston, Cooper Tomlinson, and Megan Lawless, make for suitable scene partners, but Ms. Navarrette is formidable in this film, and definitely someone to pay attention to. The production team is solid, particularly Taylor Clemons cinematography, and Vivian Gray's production design. Worth watching, and definitely sparks the curiosity of what this writer/director is going to do next.  

Dead Man's Wire

Movie Name: Dead Man's Wire
Year of Release: 2025
Director: Gus Van Sant
Starring: Bill Skarsgard, Cary Elwes, Dacre Montgomery, Colman Domingo, Al Pacino, Kelly Lynch, Myha'la, John Robinson, Todd Gable, Mark Helms, Michael Ashcraft, Neil Mulac, Daniel R. Hill, Dean Coutris, Vinh Nguyen, Maresha Robinson
Score out of ten (whole numbers only): 7
Watch it on Amazon

Synopsis and Review

The talented Gus Van Sant is back, after taking a detour with directing the mini-series "Feud", and following his underrated gem, "Don't Worry, He Won't Get Far on Foot". This time around he tackles a real life event which took place in the 1970s, in the Indianapolis area. The narrative follows the events set in motion by Tony Kiritsis, who arrives for an appointment with a mortgage broker by the name of M.L. Hall, who owns Meridian Mortgage, only to find out that M.L. is on vacation in Florida. He meets with M.L.'s son, Richard, who is also employed at the same Mortgage company. Upon reaching Richard's office, Tony quickly seizes the situation with a hidden shotgun, and wires it to Richard's neck as a dead man's switch. He claims that M.L. and Meridian robbed him of millions, after he bought some land and planned to work with an investor to develop it. Tony communicates with the police what he has done and what his demands are, and eventually manages to get in a police car with Richard, and instructs the latter to drive them both to his apartment. Tony claims he has booby-trapped his apartment and if someone tries anything, the entire complex will explode. Tony explains to the local radio DJ, Fred Temple, what has prompted his extreme behavior, and makes a variety of demands, including his own exoneration from what is happening. 

Gus Van Sant is a great storyteller. He manages to both capture poetry in motion, but is also able to capture the nuances of relationships between his characters, be it in dramatically inclined storylines, or in dark comedy ones, which can be witnessed in "Milk" and "To Die For" respectively. "Dead Man's Wire" brings to life, with an accurate detail for the period, the despair of someone who believes wholeheartedly how deeply wronged they have been. Tony, perfectly embodied by Bill Skarsgard, is seeking some restitution, but the film suggests this is a story of a man who always faded into the background, and who wants his comeuppance. Tony views the the missed opportunity he had as more than a business venture that just eluded him, it's a life that passed him by, that was denied to him. His need for revenge, his need for that public attention, and for that public apology, is a shout against all that life has failed to provide him. Mr. Van Sant manages to keep this narrative moving with gusto, with a set of characters that are illustrated briefly, but with enough detail to make them all feel vividly real. The cast is fantastic, led by the wonderful Bill Skarsgard, who gets great support from Colman Domingo, the always fantastic Al Pacino, and the underrated Cary Elwes. The production team is superb, including Danny Elfman's score, Arnaud Potier's cinematography, Stefan Dechant's production design, and Peggy Schnitzer's costumes. It's a solid film from an underrated storyteller. Worth watching.

Pillion

Movie Name: Pillion
Year of Release: 2025
Director: Harry Lighton
Starring: Harry Melling, Alexander Skarsgard, Douglas Hodge, Lesley Sharp, Jake Shears, Mat Hill, Nick Figgis, Zoe Engerer, Jake Sharp, Jacob Carter, Anthony Welsh
Score out of ten (whole numbers only): 7
Watch it on Amazon

Synopsis and Review

Harry Lighton's "Pillion" had its debut at the Cannes Film Festival of 2025, where it won the screenplay prize in the "Un Certain Regard" section of the festival. Since then it has collected a plethora of awards across a variety of film festivals, and it was nominated for three Bafta awards, including Outstanding British Film of the Year. A well deserving collection of awards for what is Harry Lighton's feature directorial debut. The narrative follows the story of Colin, a meek and shy gay man who lives with is parents in the London area. His mom is battling a terminal illness, he works a rather dead-end job, and takes some joy in singing with his dad in a barbershop quartet. During one of his performances at a local pub, he gets a note from Ray, a tall and handsome biker. The two hook up during Christmas, and while Colin eagerly wants to reconnect, Ray simply states he is not around much. They eventually reconnect, and Colin enters into a master/servant type of relationship with Ray, which includes him cooking, cleaning, shopping, and sleeping on the floor, at the foot of the bed. They have a controlled sexual relationship, which also does not include kissing, or any intimacy afterwards. Colin settles into Ray's universe and becomes familiar with his lifestyle, including the group he usually hangs out with. Colin's parents become worried about this new direction in his life, and want to know more about Ray. Ray eventually agrees to have lunch with his parents, which turns awkward very quickly, as they don't understand the dynamics of the relationship between the two men. A few weeks go by, and Colin's mother dies. The unravel he experiences following this event sends him on a path to challenge the dynamics of the relationship, which leaves Ray increasingly uncomfortable.

While the relationship dynamics this film illustrates may not be to everyone's taste, the most remarkable thing about this film is the disarming way in which Harry Lighton illustrates how these two individuals connect, and make a relationship work (without judgement). At least for a while. At the core of this film is also the realization that behind the artifice there has to be something emotionally real and tangible, which ties people together. Otherwise, it's just an empty game that soon runs out of novelty and meaning. While Colin quickly realizes this and wants to progress to something more meaningful in the relationship, Ray avoids exposing himself in any way that will present something more emotionally vulnerable and unfiltered from the rigid rules he has set up in his life. The film traces this path in the relationship between these two people, how something evolves, and how these paths force people to make decisions in which way they want to go and be. For some, it's a question of learning more about who they are, for others is about preserving an illusion of control and detachment. This film smartly asks all the right questions of what we want from a partner, even if it presents them in a master/servant environment, with sex excursions thrown in to spice things up a bit more. There are certainly aspects to these characters that could have been more expanded, but as is, they still come across quite vividly. Harry Melling and Alexander Skarsgard are fantastic, and get solid support from Douglas Hodge and the always fantastic Lesley Sharp. The production team is equally solid, including the formidable score from Oliver Coates, Nick Morris' cinematography, and Grace Snell's costume design. Move past the judgment, and enjoy this relationship tale from Harry Lighton, one that is grounded, pertinent, and asks all the right questions. Worth watching. 

Keeper

Movie Name: Keeper
Year of Release: 2025
Director: Osgood Perkins
Starring: Tatiana Maslany, Rossif Sutherland, Birkett Turton, Eden Weiss
Score out of ten (whole numbers only): 5
Watch it on Amazon

Synopsis and Review

These last few years have been particularly busy and prolific for writer/producer/director Osgood Perkins. Following the breakout hit which was "Longlegs", the multi-hyphenate has subsequently released "The Monkey", which was another modest and well reviewed hit, and "Keeper" which largely flew under the radar. And he currently is in post-production for another film to be released this year. "Keeper" follows the narrative of a recent couple consisting of Liz and Malcolm, who go to a cabin in the woods during a weekend to celebrate their one-year anniversary. They're getting close to making it official. Liz is far more cosmopolitan than Malcolm, and one of her closest friends bluntly asks why is she going to a remote cabin with a man she's known for little over a year. When they get to the cabin they encounter a cake left by the caretaker on the kitchen table. They're soon interrupted by Malcolm's loud cousin Darren, who has a model girlfriend in tow, Minka. While the two men go off to briefly chat, Minka tells Liz the cake tastes awful. Even though Liz doesn't like chocolate cake, Malcolm insists she has some. She caves in, and during the night while Malcolm is sleeping, she has haunting visions. She is also drawn to the cake, which she finishes in one sitting, even though she encounters severed fingers inside. Malcolm who is a doctor is called into town due to an emergency with one of his patients. Liz stays behind and strange occurrences start happening. She encounters a ghostly presence of Minka, alongside a woman wearing a plastic bag over her head. Darren shows up again, demanding to be let it in the cabin. While reticent, Liz agrees and following a brief chat, goes and hides in the bathroom. Darren is attacked, but Liz is unaware of the situation, but asks her friend Maggie to come get her. 

"Keeper" is a smaller scale film for Osgood Perkins, particularly when compared with "Longlegs" and "The Monkey". The script written by Nick Lepard, largely takes place in the cabin and its nearby woods. Mr. Perkins is successful at quickly establishing the dynamics between the couple, and their personality traits: the cosmopolitan yet not entirely self assured Liz, and the quieter, sensible, and devoted Malcolm. He also manages to illustrate the environment quite successfully, with the cabin having a retro look to it, which also brings back to mind some horror films of the 1980s. The supernatural elements are added progressively, like preparing a concoction where the unsettling ingredient shows progressively, and not all at once. The sentiments of unease grow for Liz, who feels somewhat trapped in a strange environment, and the more she uncovers, the more unsettled she is, while Malcolm never loses his mild mannered behavior. While all the ingredients for this film are there, and the cooking is done impeccably, the problem lies with the recipe itself. When the final chapter comes along, and the revelation behind all the supernatural events occur, there isn't much substance to it: these events feel underdeveloped, which poses a higher challenge for the creature and visual effects to do the additional work for a story that is poorly put together. Mr. Perkins manages to craft a visually compelling film, with a very talented cast, particularly the always underrated Tatiana Maslany, who has great support from Rossif Sutherland, but try as they might, the narrative just doesn't sustain their talent, nor the horror factor they're trying to convey. Sadly, and unlike "The Monkey", this film also doesn't have much humor to it, which also makes it less palatable. The production team is great, with Edo Van Breemen's score, Jeremy Cox's cinematography, and Danny Vermette's production design, shining through. Mr. Perkins is a solid storyteller, but this script just didn't do his talents enough justice. Watchable, but forgettable.

Lee Cronin's The Mummy

Movie Name: Lee Cronin's The Mummy
Year of Release: 2026
Director: Lee Cronin
Starring: Jack Reynor, Laia Costa, May Calamawy, Natalie Grace, Shylo Molina, Billie Roy, Veronica Falcon, Hayat Kamille, May Elghety, Emily Mitchell, Husam Chadat
Score out of ten (whole numbers only): 5
Watch it on Amazon

Synopsis and Review

After establishing himself with his bloody take on the"Evil Dead" franchise, writer/director Lee Cronin is back, this time around tackling a different mythological character from another well known horror/adventure franchise, "The Mummy". The narrative follows the story of the Cannon family, comprised of father Charlie, mother Larissa, and two young kids, Katie and Sebastian. They're stationed in Egypt, as Charlie is an investigative reporter. Katie is taken by a woman known as the Magician, and while the family desperately looks for her, she is never found. The family moves back to New Mexico, and eight years go by, during which time Larissa has gives birth to another girl, though the family never loses faith of Katie being discovered. A cargo plane in Egypt in the meantime crashes, and inside its remains a sarcophagus is uncovered. When archeologists open the sarcophagus, they're horrified to find Katie, wrapped in parchment inscribed with an ancient language. Charlie and Larissa are informed of the development, and they quickly get to Egypt to retrieve her. However they're informed the person that has been uncovered, is not the same girl they once knew. She is in a catatonic state and isn't able to communicate. They bring Katie back to New Mexico, where they have the assistance of Larissa's devout catholic mother, Carmen. Charlie wants to learn more about what has happened to his daughter, as does one of the police officers who investigated the case in Egypt. Charlie eventually discovers that the inscriptions on Katie's skin and on the bandages, are about a Nasmaranian, a demon that destroys and communities. The mummification ritual and the scriptures on the skin manage to contain it. While he is uncovering all this, Katie's behavior becomes more violent, as the entity manifests itself more strongly.

Audiences expecting this film to be an expansion of the universe created by Stephen Sommers' "The Mummy", are in for a radical experience (and departure), since this film is more firmly planted in the "Evil Dead" type of genre, more so than the action/adventure stylings that brought fame to Brendan Fraser, Rachel Weisz, and John Hannah in the aforementioned series. Lee Cronin takes his time establishing the backdrop to the events that start occurring with this family, though once again, not much attention is granted to these characters, beyond the fact that they're parents and hold a job (well loosely hold a job). The traumatic disappearance of the young Katie could have been a situation that would have driven these individuals apart, but that doesn't seem to be the case. Mr. Cronin, much like he did with his version of "Evil Dead", brings the disruptor force into a confined space, with this demonic entity preying on this vulnerable family. The confinement gives the narrative a sense of dread and inescapability, with the progressive violent attacks being heightened by the gore of the situations. The extreme gore and grotesqueness of certain scenes is where the film also falls prey to some sensationalism - at times restraint, suggestion, is far more interesting than going for shock value for the audiences. The film feels unbalanced, as if the director is trying to be analytical and create a thriller about a young girl gone missing, while simultaneously dialing up the grotesque and horrifying elements. These two aspects don't necessarily co-exist very harmoniously, making in the process most of the characters rather bland and forgettable. The cast tries their best with the material they have, with Veronica Falcon and Natalie Grace coming across with the stronger performances. The production team is solid, particularly David Garbett's cinematography, Nick Bassett's production design, and the visual & makeup effects. It's an interesting take on a classical and iconic figure, one that could have benefited from a more integrated storyline. 

They Will Kill You

Movie Name: They Will Kill You
Year of Release: 2026
Director: Kirill Sokolov 
Starring: Zazie Beetz, Patricia Arquette, Paterson Joseph, Heather Graham, Tom Felton, Willie Ludik, Myha'la, David Viviers, Gabe Gabriel, James Remar, Viktoria Korotkova
Score out of ten (whole numbers only): 2
Watch it on Amazon

Synopsis and Review

"They Will Kill You" is a production from the Muschietti siblings, who have been responsible for "It" and "The Flash", all under the Warner Bros. banner. The film follows the story of Asia Reaves, whom we first encounter trying to escape her abusive father with her young sister in tow. He soon catches up with them, and following a heated situation, Asia ends up in prison, and her young sister back in the claws of the abuser. 10 years go by, and Asia gets released from prison. She goes after her sister, who is now working at a place by the name of Virgil, an exclusive high-rise in NY. She introduces herself as someone else, a cleaning woman who was supposed to come for a job, and Lily Woodhouse, the manager of the building, explains a bit of the history of the building and its occupants. Everything seems fine, until during the night while Asia is asleep, she's attacked by a slew of individuals. She wards them off, and kills a few in the process, much to their surprise, who were expecting a docile and powerless woman. Lily is furious at the outcome of the situation, and warns Asia there's no escape. Asia in the meantime explains she's there for her sister, and won't leave without her. Much to Asia's surprise and shock, all her attackers come back to life: she hides in the vents of the building while she tries to figure out a strategy to get Maria and escape these killers. Ray, Lily's husband, comes to her rescue, and explains the truth behind the building, his wife, and the attackers. 

These days not many people remember the name Timur Bekmambetov, but twenty something years ago he made a splash stateside with the films "Night Watch" and "Day Watch", which were huge hits in Russia. Those films opened the doors for him to direct "Wanted" which turned out to be his biggest hit so far. He followed "Wanted" with "Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter" and the remake of "Ben Hur", films that landed with poor reviews and meager audience attendance. Why am I bringing this name into this review? Kirill Sokolov also hails from Russia, and prior to this film he has tackled a few shorts and two feature films, which apparently granted him the keys to this film with a solid cast and great production values. Sadly that's where this film ends. The film has more than obvious references to Quentin Tarantino, Walter Hill, and even Michael Davis' "Shoot 'Em Up", sadly without much of the humor, or point of view these film makers have displayed in their films (well at least Mr. Tarantino and Mr. Hill). There are no characters in this film, just disposable puppets who meet their end in various situations of carnage, which in premise may seem fun, but in reality is not. And it's not funny, because this film doesn't have enough smarts to play with concepts of entitlement, economic disparity, or even racial profiling, instead using violence as a slapstick moment that grows old very quickly. Turns out, exuberant death scenes only mean anything when there's a bit of character development to illustrate why they deserve some of the fate they're (repeatedly) experiencing. What's left after all this is said and done: Zazie Beetz and Patricia Arquette are solid actresses who deserve better material, but who at least get a lion share of attention, while Tom Felton and the underused Heather Graham are just fodder for the killing grinding that occurs during the film. The production team is solid, giving the film enough of a stylized look to make it watchable. That includes Carlos Rafael Rivera's score, Isaac Bauman's cinematography, and Jeremy Reed's production design. This is a formula driven film that doesn't live up to the pretension it has or the films that is inspired by. It's a pass.

Robocop

Movie Name: Robocop
Year of Release: 1987
Director: Paul Verhoeven
Starring: Peter Weller, Nancy Allen, Kurtwood Smith, Miguel Ferrer, Ronny Cox, Ray Wise, Robert DoQui, Felton Perry, Paul McCrane, Jesse D. Goins, Dan O'Herlihy, Del Zamora
Score out of ten (whole numbers only): 7
Watch it on Amazon

Synopsis and Review

Few films have managed to become imminently associated with a particular decade, but the 1980s has quite a few of them, including Steven Spielberg's "Indiana Jones" series, Joe Dante's "Gremlins", Robert Zemeckis' "Back to the Future", Ivan Reitman's "Ghostbusters", James Cameron's "Aliens", Tim Burton's "Batman", James Ivory's Merchant Ivory adaptation "A Rom with a View", and the list goes on, but one that is unmissable from that list is Paul Verhoeven's "Robocop". Mr. Verhoeven who at the time had just directed "Flesh + Bood", sped up his career into bigger projects thanks to the success of "Robocop", which originated not quite as interesting sequels, animated shows, and the list goes on. The film follows the story of Alex Murphy, an honest police officer with a wife and a kid, living in Detroit, a city that is at the brink of social and financial collapse. The city has set up an arrangement with a private corporation, Omni Consumer Products, to control and assist the Detroit Police Department that is struggling with salaries (and retention of their police officers), and the non stop crime and violence in the city. Omni wants to add more technology to the Police Department, including a concept for a Robocop. The prototypes are not faring quite so well. Murphy and his partner Anne Lewis, are pursuing criminals, in particular Clarence Boddicker, a violent and sadistic individual who leads a gang, and they have their hands involved in everything. Murphy and Lewis manage to locate Boddicker's gang, but they're separated, and Murphy gets violently killed by the gang. Murphy's remains are assigned to the Robocop project, and he is revitalized as a human/cyborg hybrid. He is brought back to Metro West, and while everyone believes his memories of his former self have been erased, he still remains with traits of his Murphy personality, something that Anne Lewis starts noticing. Another thing everyone starts noticing, is how Robocop wastes no time, and stars battling crime with no ambiguity or fear. That is until he uncovers wrongdoing coming from Omni itself.

"Robocop" features something that has become a stalwart of Mr. Verhoeven's films, particularly the futuristic ones: he embeds his films with social-economical view points which illustrate societal unbalances, political allegories on fascism, how crime prevails across a putrid system that thrives on abusing those with few resources while those in positions of power thrive. "Robocop" which could at first glance go in the direction of a reductive comic book type of approach, meaning formulaic and revenge driven, opts instead to bring questions such as the relationship between humans and technology, ambition walking hand in hand with crime, society collapsing due to greedy corporations, all of these topics wrapped up in what is, in a lot of ways, a modernized western with a lone ranger at its core. Mr. Verhoeven manages to create an entertaining and also very palatable allegory, one that illustrates where societies can in fact go when economic power tilts the direction of government, when crime goes unchecked, particularly as it climbs the economic and political ladder, and how frail and expendable human lives can be in these types of situations. Essentially, how human lives become pawns in a game that is solely focused on money and power, and where human lives register very poorly. It's a film where the director knows he has to entertain and bring an aspect of action and excitement to what is happening, but he does so with a very well positioned critical view of society, peppering the narrative with his particular heightened taste in violence and gore, which once again illustrates just how brutal life and individuals can be. The characters could benefit from extra development, particularly Nancy Allen's Anne Lewis and Ronny Cox's Jones, but the film still manages to pack a powerful punch. The cast is uniformly great, with Peter Weller, Nancy Allen, Ronny Cox, Miguel Ferrer, Robert DoQui, Kurtwood Smith, and Dan O'Herlihy, creating strong and memorable performances. The production team is equally top notch, including Jost Vacano's cinematography, Basil Poledouris' score, and William Sandell's production design. It's a classic that hasn't lost any of its power or relevance. Worth watching.