Year of Release: 2017
Director: Ruben Ostlund
Starring: Claes Bang, Elisabeth Moss, Dominic West, Terry Notary, Christopher Laesso, Lise Stephenson Engstrom, Lilianne Mardon, Marina Schiptjenko, Annica Liljeblad, Elijandro Edouard, Daniel Hallberg, Martin Sooder
Genre: Drama, Satire
Score out of ten (whole numbers only): 3
Watch it on Amazon
Synopsis and Review
Director Ruben Ostlund has been on a winning streak since "Force Majeure" premiered in 2014. His following picture "The Square" won the Palm D'Or in 2017, and his most recent endeavor, repeated the feat, "Triangle of Sadness" which premiered in 2022. "The Square" follows the story of Christian, a divorced father of two, who is the director and chief curator for the X-Royal art museum in Stockholm. He has a new art installation for a forthcoming exhibit placed in the museum area, by the name of "The Square" and has commissioned an agency with creating a campaign who will drive more people to the museum, but also more patrons and donors. Simultaneously he has been apparently burglarized on a street scheme, where his phone, wallet and cufflinks were taken. He and his assistant manage to uncover the location of the phone (using the "find my phone" feature"), and decide upon a plan to force the robber to surrender the items. They go ahead with their plan, but a few days later his wallet and phone reappear in a package left for him at a 7-Eleven. In the meantime he has had a sexual tryst with a journalist by the name of Anne, who is interested in moving the relationship beyond the casual, something that Christian is not so engaged upon. Turns out Christian and Michael's plan had some unexpected results, and a young Arab boy confronts firstly Michael and then Christian with the aftermath of their actions: he states his family believes him to be a thief, and that now he's in constant trouble. He wants them to repair what has happened. In the meantime, a promotional and highly controversial reel for the new exhibit premieres online, generating waves of incredulity and shock towards the museum, which has an immediate impact on Christian's career.
The term satire is used very often when lofty and weighty themes are addressed, in a manner that is not dramatic, but not ostensibly comedic either. It's become in my opinion, a "warehouse term", something that is brandished around, when all other categories fail, but something still needs to be categorized. What I would deem solid satire or even comedic goldmine, is the work of Billy Wilder in so many of his films, where he was able to tackle some themes with snark and an incisiveness that defied and to this day still defies rivalry. "The Square" tries to be many things, and positions itself as a very smart reflection on how we currently live, and does so from the perspective from a very privileged and cultured individual in a very powerful position. The script takes stabs at the pretentiousness of art, at those who live in its periphery, and how that becomes an excuse for nonsensical behavior (case in point, Terry Notary's entire sequence), even at the point of certain grotesqueness of those same behaviors. There's also observations on ego driven males, the inability of shaping mature relationships, and even the state of society and its inequalities, and how even these latter topics are fodder for poorly created marketing campaigns. It's a list of hefty topics, all of which come tumbling down and at times crash with each other, in the life of a central character that at the end of a two and half hour film, still feels as underdeveloped and unknown as he was when the narrative was set in motion. In reality most of the characters who inhabit this narrative feel like an abstract concept, as if they try to minimally represent a persona without truly moving beyond a rather limited description. The film fails to capitalize on the cast that it assembles, with Elisabeth Moss and Dominic West in particular feeling lost and underused, though Claes Bang does his best to make Christian appear both self-involved but also sufficiently humane to illustrate his arc and attitude shifting during the feature. It's a film with lofty ambitions, most of which are not sufficiently realized, one where the apparent intelligence that seems to fuel it, only reveals some of the shallowness of the reflection itself (and not of the topics). It's a film that aims to be something that it ultimately unfulfilled.
0 comments:
Post a Comment